MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2172684784 · doi:10.1111/aen.12185

Next step toward a molecular phylogeny of click‐beetles (<scp>C</scp>oleoptera: <scp>E</scp>lateridae): redefinition of <scp>P</scp>ityobiinae, with a description of a new subfamily <scp>P</scp>arablacinae from the <scp>A</scp>ustralasian <scp>R</scp>egion

2015· article· en· W2172684784 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAustral Entomology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersGrantová Agentura České RepublikyCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
KeywordsSubfamilyPolyphylyBiologyLineage (genetic)Sister groupCladePhylogenetic treeTaxonPhylogeneticsEvolutionary biologyZoologyBotanyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract E lateridae represents one of the largest families within C oleoptera, yet their interrelationships remain under‐investigated. Molecular data are missing for most lineages, especially for the species‐poor suprageneric taxa. In this study, we investigated the limits and phylogenetic position of P ityobiinae sensu Calder (1996), a group of several small genera from the N ew W orld and A ustralasia, using maximum likelihood and B ayesian inference methods. We merged new sequence data with those deposited in G en B ank, producing a final matrix of 178 terminal taxa and covering the main click‐beetle subfamilies. The resulting topologies showed E laterinae as sister to remaining click‐beetle lineages, and A grypninae as sister to the Morostomatinae + D endrometrinae + C ardiophorinae + N egastriinae clade. M embers of H emiopinae, L issominae, Thylacosterninae and P ityobiinae formed basal lineages within E lateridae − E laterinae. We found L issominae to be polyphyletic, including T hylacosterninae as a terminal lineage and with O estodini forming an independent lineage outside that clade. Therefore, the subfamily O estodinae stat. nov. was reinstated for the N orth A merican genera O estodes L eConte and B ladus L e C onte. The Australian genera D icteniophorus C andèze, D rymelater C alder and S tichotomus C andèze were transferred from D endrometrinae to E laterinae. P ityobiinae was recovered as two distant lineages in all analyses and correspondingly the subfamily is reduced to contain only the N orth A merican P ityobius L e C onte and tentatively the S outh A merican T ibionema S olier, for which we have no DNA sequences. Additionally, we propose P arablacinae subfam. nov. for the remaining former pityobiine genera from A ustralia and N ew Z ealand. The new subfamily includes P arablax S chwarz, M etablax C andèze, W ynarka C alder, X uthelater C alder, T asmanelater C alder, P arasaphes C andèze and also O phidius C andèze, which is transferred here from E laterinae. We failed to find universally diagnostic synapomorphies in adult morphology for P arablacinae, a common problem in elaterid taxonomy. Future research, including a comprehensive phylogeny of the subfamily and re‐examination of the morphology of its species is crucial to understanding the limits and classification of this lineage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it