In vitro Treatment with cis-[Ru(H-dcbpy-)2(Cl)(NO)] Improves the Endothelial Function in Aortic Rings with Endothelial Dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The ruthenium complex cis-[Ru(H-dcbpy-)2(Cl)(NO)] (DCBPY) is a nitric oxide (NO) donor and studies suggested that the ruthenium compounds can inactivate O2-. The aim of this study is to test if DCBPY can revert and/or prevent the endothelial dysfunction. METHODS: Normotensive (2K) and hypertensive (2K-1C) wistar rats were used. To vascular reactivity study, thoracic aortas were isolated, rings with intact endothelium were incubated with: DCBPY: 0.1; 1 and 10μM, DCBPY plus hydroxocobalin (NO scavenger) or tempol during 30 minutes, and concentration effect curves to acetylcholine were performed. The potency values (pD2) and maximum effect (ME) were analyzed. The O2- was generated using hypoxantine xantine oxidase and the reduction of cytochrome c, NO consumption by O2- and the effect in avoid NO consumption was measured. RESULTS: In 2K-1C DCBPY at 0.1; 1 or 10μM improved the relaxation endothelium dependent induced by acetylcholine in aortic rings compared to control 2K-1C, and also improved ME. In rings from 2K incubation with DCBPY (0.1; 1.0 and 10 μM) did not change pD2 or ME. Incubation with 0.1 μM of DCBPY plus hydroxocobalamin did not modify the potency and ME in 2K-1C compared to DCBPY (0.1 μM). DCBPY and SOD inhibits the reduction of cytochrome c and inhibited the NO consumption by O2-, showing that O2- has been removed from the solution. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that DCBPY at a lower concentration (0.1 µM) is not an NO generator, but can inactivate superoxide and improves the endothelial function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".