The mission, vision and values in hospital management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Management depends on choices, on the hierarchy of actions, goals and values on which these decisions are founded, because values guide our actions. This study aims to identify the contents exposed in the vision, mission and values of the hospitals in the north of Portugal. It also aims to analyze the existence of content differentiation, based on the implemented management model.Methods: The design of this study is exploratory, descriptive, and explanatory. Thus, the data qualitative analysis was performed on the contents of the mission, values and vision publicized on the web pages available on 12th and 13th April 2014 in 36 Hospitals/Medical Centers of the National Health Service and hospitals linked with the Ministry of Health, for the purpose of the Integrated Management System of Subscribers to Surgery.Results: According to the definition of their mission, values and vision, the values on which hospitals are anchored focus on assistance, organization and management, quality, ethics and social responsibility. The expression of spirituality is limited to two hospitals. As for the hospital’s mission, spirituality is expressly assumed in six of the hospitals. Regarding the implemented management model, hospitals explicitly present their values, mission and vision, whether they are integrated into the National Health Service, irrespective of their legal nature (Public-Private Partnership or Public Enterprise), whether they are from the private or social sector. All of them claim to have ethical values, expressing the need to promote human dignity, the quality in the various areas and the holistic care to be provided. The concern of the private sector to add value for its employees, recipients and shareholders stands out.Conclusions: Managers recognize that ethics and human values are the foundation for the functioning of hospitals. They are aware that the mission, values and vision constitute accreditation criteria, acknowledging that they have a global reach. In the Social Sector, they are declared in the Quality Policy and in hospitals with a Public Enterprise management model they are framed in the Institutional Ethics Code.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it