A DFT-D study on the stability and intramolecular interactions of the energetic salts of 3,6-dihydrazido-1,2,4,5-tetrazine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Structures of the salts I–IV formed by 3,6-dihydrazido-1,2,4,5-tetrazine with HNO3, HN(NO2)2, HClO4, and HC(NO2)3, respectively, were studied using dispersion-corrected density functional theory. The intramolecular hydrogen bond energies of I–IV were estimated using the quantum theory of atoms in molecules. The total hydrogen bond energies (EH,tot) have the order of I (65.60 kcal/mol) > II (46.24 kcal/mol) > III (39.13 kcal/mol) > IV (19.68 kcal/mol). In addition, the charge transfer (q), binding energy (Eb), lattice energy (HL), dispersion energy (Edis), and second-order perturbation energy (E2) were evaluated for studying the intramolecular interactions between the cation and anion. Linear relationships exist between any two of EH,tot, qtot, Eb, and E2,tot. HLs have the same variation trend as h50s (characteristic height) and may be used as the indicator of impact sensitivity. The HOMOs and LUMOs of I–IV are derived from the HOMOs of the isolated anions and the LUMOs of the isolated cations, respectively. Ultraviolet spectra of I–IV have the strongest absorptions at around 442, 445, 427, and 587 nm, respectively. The excitations HOMO→LUMO to HOMO–7→LUMO play important roles in the first three excited states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".