<i>Cyclo</i>Saligenyl Pronucleotides of 5-Iodo and 5-Trifluoromethyl-1-(2-deoxy-β-<scp>D</scp>-ribofuranosyl)-2,4-difluorobenzene Mimics of Thymidine: Synthesis and Evaluation of this Pronucleotide Monophosphate Delivery System for Compounds with Potential Anticancer Activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A group of unnatural 1-(2-deoxy-beta-D-ribofuranosyl)-2,4-difluorobenzenes possessing a 5-I or 5-CF3 substituent, that were originally designed as thymidine mimics, were coupled via their 5'-OH group to a cyclosaligenyl (cycloSal) ring system having a variety of C-3 substituents (Me, OMe, H). The 5'-O-cycloSal-pronucleotide concept was designed to effect a thymidine kinase-bypass, thereby providing a method for the intracellular delivery and generation of the 5'-O-monophosphate for nucleosides that are poorly phosphorylated. The 5'-O-cycloSal pronucleotide phosphotriesters synthesized in this study were obtained as a 1:1 mixture of two diastereomers that differ in configuration (S(P) or R(P)) at the asymmetric phosphorous center. The (S(P))- and (R(P))-diastereomers for the 5'-O-3-methylcycloSal- and 5'-O-3-methoxycycloSal derivatives of 1-(2-deoxy-beta-D-ribofuranosyl)-2,4-difluoro-5-iodobenzene were separated by silica gel flash column chromatography. This class of cycloSal pronucleotide compounds generally exhibited weak cytotoxic activities in a MTT assay (CC50 values in the 10(-3) to 10(-4) M range), against a number of cancer cell lines (143B, 143B-LTK, EMT-6, Hela, 293), except for cyclosaligenyl-5'-O-[1'-(2,4-difluoro-5-iodophenyl)-2'-deoxy-beta-D-ribofuranosyl]phosphate that was more potent (CC50 values in the 10(-5) to 10(-6) M range), than the reference drug 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IUDR) which showed CC50 values in the 10(-3) to 10(-5) M range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".