Entre la libertad económica y la justicia social: las ideas económicas de "Orden cristinano", 1941-1948
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen La revista Orden Cristiano (1941-1948) es un ejemplo de las tensiones y complejidades politicas e ideologicas del periodo, en tanto sus colaboradores buscaron posicionarse dentro del mundo catolico vinculados, a la vez, con los frentes antifascistas y antiperonistas. Similares tensiones pueden apreciarse en las ideas economicas adoptadas por la revista y sus colaboradores. En relacion con su compromiso politico-ideologico de reconciliar liberalismo y catolicismo, buscaron armonizar principios economicos relacionados con ambos: asi, la libertad economica y sindical, en el caso del primero, y la primacia de los valores religiosos en la actividad economica y la justicia social, en el del segundo. Abstract The magazine Orden Cristiano (1941-1948) is an example of the political and ideological tensions and nuances of the period, as its contributors sought to position themselves both within the Catholic world as well as in relation to the antifascist and anti-Peronist fronts. Similar tensions can be perceived in the magazine's economic ideas. In relation to their ideological and political commitment to reconcile liberalism and Catholicism, they sought to harmonize economic principles linked to both liberalism, such as regarding economic and union freedom, and Catholicism, such as the superiority of religious values in economics and social justice. Palabras clave Liberalismo, Catolicismo, Antifacismo, Antiperonismo
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".