Drying-induced shrinkage of Boom clay: an experimental investigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drying-induced shrinkage of geomaterials may have a strong effect on geostructure stability and deformation. The settlement of foundations and fracture openings in slopes, roads, and tunnel walls may be due to drying shrinkage. However, there is still a lack of knowledge concerning shrinkage evolution with time and shrinkage propagation within the material. In this study, the shrinkage of a specific clayey rock — Boom clay — under drying conditions is investigated experimentally. This rock is a deep geological formation, which is under study for high-level and long-term radioactive waste storage in Belgium. Two experimental campaigns are presented. The first, based on the vapour equilibrium drying technique and coupled with sample size manual measurement, aims to characterize the material shrinkage in balanced states. The second, based on the convective drying technique and coupled with shape monitoring using X-ray tomography, aims to analyse how shrinkage develops before reaching a steady state. Both approaches put in evidence the shrinkage anisotropy of this structurally bedded rock, with a ratio around 2 between the direction of maximum strains and the direction of minimum strains. However, the two drying techniques also provide complementary results as the relation between the amount of shrinkage and the retention curve (for uniform drying imposed with saline solutions) and the kinetics of shrinkage propagation inside the material (for nonuniform drying imposed with air convection).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".