MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2173740989

Зарубежный опыт медико-социального сопровождения детского населения (обзор)

2014· article· ru· W2173740989 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
А. З. Фаррахов, В Ю Альбицкий, Устинова Наталия Вячеславовна, Р. Ф. Шавалиев

Bibliographic record

VenueПроблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины · 2014
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationPediatricsSocial workMedical educationMedicineFamily medicinePolitical scienceEnvironmental healthLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article considers issues related to development of social pediatrics abroad and determines actuality of its approaches for effective health protection of children population in modern society. The awareness of necessity of wide-spread implementation of approaches and principles of social pediatrics occurs because of increased impact of social psychological problems on health of children population. The universities of Europe, USA and Canada, India, Australia and many other countries are teaching social pediatrics. The societies, foundations, centers, institutions of social pediatrics function and specialized journals are published. The significant achievements in the field of education of social pediatrics to pediatricians are noted in the medical college in Montefiore (South Bronx, New York) were three-years residency on social pediatrics was organized in 1970. The Mac Gill University (Montreal, Canada) is yet one organization involved into advancement of social pediatrics. In this university a two-year educational program on social pediatrics was organized in 2006 to develop new manpower potential of pediatricians (“socialpediatricians”). The popularization of approaches of social pediatrics is determined mainly by efforts of the International society of social pediatrics (ISSOP) organized in 1977. The definitions of social pediatrics proposed by ISSOP permitted to determine main characteristics of its approaches: multidisciplinarity (team work with specialists of different profiles medical workers, psychologists, pedagogues, social workers) and intersectorality (interaction with school, administration structures, municipalities, etc.). The article presents as a practical example of effective application of approaches of social pediatrics experience of Canadian pediatricians. Therefore, medical monitoring of children population with consideration for psycho-social factors based on principles and approaches of social pediatrics is acknowledged as a necessary (central) element of system of protection of health of children population in economically developed countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueПроблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медициныSame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207