MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2173949389 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2015-0308

Electrodeposition of metal cations from the wet ionic liquid [EMIM][TFSI]

2015· article· en· W2173949389 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Matthew C. Deen, Christina Shamshoom, Alison Gamble, Dorin Bejan, Nigel J. Bunce

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonic liquidChemistryCopperInorganic chemistryElectrochemistryMetalElectrolysisElectrochemical windowIonic bondingCathodeIonElectrolyteElectrodeIonic conductivityOrganic chemistryCatalysisPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigated the deposition of silver, copper, and lead from the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide [EMIM][TFSI] under potentiostatic conditions in the presence of water. This was part of a larger project involving the extraction of metal ions from mining waste into an ionic liquid followed by electrodeposition so that the ionic liquid could be recycled. All three elements were deposited in metallic form by electrolysis in the ionic liquid, and the process was enhanced rather than hindered by the presence of water. The deposited metals did not adhere strongly to the cathode of the electrochemical cell, especially when Ebonex® was used as the cathode. The deposition of silver showed little temperature dependence, and at temperatures close to ambient, the ionic liquid was not adversely affected. The deposits of copper and lead gradually re-dissolved after electrodeposition, suggesting that chemical re-oxidation of these metals by air is more facile in the ionic liquid than in water. Copper showed strong evidence of formation of a Cu+ species upon reduction of Cu2+ (not seen in water); lead (Pb2+) showed evidence of a time-dependent complexation with the anions of the ionic liquid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207