MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2174001346 · doi:10.7863/ultra.15.02022

Accuracy of Spleen Measurement by Medical Residents Using Hand‐Carried Ultrasound

2015· article· en· W2174001346 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shane Arishenkoff, Christopher Eddy, James M. Roberts, Luke Y. C. Chen, Silvia D. Chang, Parvathy Nair, Rose Hatala, Kevin W. Eva, Graydon S. Meneilly

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound in Clinical Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia HospitalVancouver Hospital and Health Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSonographerMedicineUltrasoundNuclear medicinePhysical therapyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Easily palpable splenomegaly can be identified on physical examination, but it is difficult to detect lesser degrees of splenomegaly. Rapid bedside assessment can be conducted with hand-carried ultrasound. We performed this study to determine whether medical residents could reliably assess spleen size using hand-carried ultrasound after a brief educational intervention. METHODS: Postgraduate year 1 internal medicine residents were shown a brief (45-minute) presentation on ultrasound basics, the use of hand-carried ultrasound, and principles of splenic ultrasound imaging. They practiced on each other, using hand-carried ultrasound to assess spleen size, for 1 hour in the presence of an instructor. Patients with varying degrees of splenomegaly and hospital staff were recruited at Vancouver General Hospital. A sonographer measured spleen size in each participant using conventional ultrasound. Subsequently, the trained residents scanned the participants using hand-carried ultrasound, blinded to the sonographer's measurements and the participants' diagnoses. The instructor was not present during scanning. RESULTS: Twelve first-year residents (8 male and 4 female; mean age ± SEM, 28 ± 1 years; all with limited prior ultrasound training) and 19 patients and staff members (10 male and 9 female; mean age, 60 ± 4 years; body mass index, 24 ± 2 kg/m(2)) were recruited. The greatest longitudinal measurements were 14.0 ± 0.7 cm with conventional ultrasound administered by the sonographer and 13.2 ± 0.9 cm with hand-carried ultrasound administered by the residents (P > .05, not significant). The correlation between conventional and hand-carried ultrasound was r = 0.81 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine residents can reliably assess spleen size at the point of care using hand-carried ultrasound with minimal training. Our findings, if replicated in other centers and in different clinical scenarios, may change the way that clinicians examine the spleen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Ultrasound in MedicineSame topicUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207