K<sub>α</sub> transition probabilities for platinum and uranium ions for possible X-ray biomedical applications<sup>1</sup>This article is part of a Special Issue on the 10th International Colloquium on Atomic Spectra and Oscillator Strengths for Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Platinum compounds, such as cisplatin and other high-Z materials, are increasingly common in biomedical applications. The absorption and emission of high-energy X-rays can occur via the 1s–2p K α transitions in ions of heavy elements involving deep inner-shells. Oscillator strengths (f), line strengths (S), and radiative decay rates (A), for the 1s–2p transitions for the nine ionic states from hydrogen-like to fluorine-like, are presented for platinum and uranium. For platinum ions the K α transitions are found to be in the hard X-ray region, 64–71 keV (0.18–0.17 Å), and for uranium ions they are in the range 94–105 keV (0.12–0.13 Å). Since the number of electrons in each ionic state of the element is different, the number of K α transitions varies considerably. While there are two 1s–2p transitions (1s 2 S 1/2 –2p [Formula: see text]) in H-like ions, there are 2, 6, 2, 14, 35, 35, and 14 transitions in He-like, Li-like, Be-like, B-like, C-like, N-like, and O-like ions, respectively, for a total of 112 K α transitions for each element. These include both types of electric dipole (E1) allowed transitions, same-spin multiplicity and intercombination. The former dipole allowed transitions are in general strong; their radiative decay rates are of the order of A ∼ 10 16 s –1 . However, there are also many weaker transitions. We demonstrate the importance of these K α transitions, as they appear as resonances in photo-ionization, which is relevant to the enhanced production of Auger electrons for possible radiation diagnostics and therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".