2,3-Anhydrosugars in Glycoside Bond Synthesis. Application to α-<scp>d</scp>-Galactofuranosides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report here the use of 2,3-anhydro-D-gulofuranosyl thioglycosides and glycosyl sulfoxides in the synthesis of alpha-D-galactofuranosidic bonds, which are present in a range of bacterial and fungal glycoconjugates. This two-step method involves a stereoselective glycosylation in which a 2,3-anhydro-alpha-D-gulofuranoside is obtained either as the sole or as the major product, followed by a regioselective opening of the epoxide ring using lithium benzylate in the presence of (-)-sparteine. In exploring the scope of the method, donors protected at O5 and O6 with an isopropylidene acetal, benzyl ethers, or benzoate esters were studied. Overall, the glycosyl sulfoxides provided the products in slightly higher yields and selectivity, with the best results being obtained with benzylated and benzoylated substrates. In the epoxide ring-opening reactions, the acetal- and ether-protected donors afforded poor to modest regioselectivity, whereas the benzoylated products gave good yields of the desired alpha-D-galactofuranosides. The benzoyl-protected species are, therefore, the donors of choice for these reactions. The utility of the approach was demonstrated through the synthesis of three alpha-D-galactofuranosyl-containing oligosaccharides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".