MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<I>The Insects and Arachnids of Canada: Coleoptera: Histeridae</I>

2006· article· en· W2174754288 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Catarino, Yves Bousquet, Serge Laplante

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Entomological Society of America · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Y. Bousquet and S. Laplante, NRC Research Press, Ottowa, Ontario, Canada, 2006, 485 pages, $48 (soft), ISBN 066-019-399-X In the 24th installment of the “Insects and Arachnids of Canada” series, Yves Bousquet and Serge Laplante have upheld and probably surpassed the consistently high standards of the series. Histerid beetles have rarely been subjected to such careful treatment for so large and significant a geographic area. The authors’ primary goal, to provide a resource for identification of Canadian histerids, is admirably met. The book is sufficiently detailed and well illustrated to transform this formerly formidable task into a realistic goal for any interested researcher. The book provides thorough taxonomic treatment for 34 genera and 146 species known (135 spp.) or expected to occur in Canada. (The usual tag “… and Alaska” is not appended to this book’s title, but it would not seem that any Alaskan species are missed here.) This represents about two-thirds of Nearctic histerid genera and one-third of Nearctic species. Seven new species are described, in the genera Acritus, Gnathoncus, Euspilotus, Xerosaprinus, Hypocaccus, Eblisia, and Psiloscelis. Five formerly synonymous names are reinstated as valid species, and three new junior synonyms are designated. Introductory material includes an overview of histerid morphology, mainly to introduce terminology used in keys and descriptions as well as brief discussions of histerid biology and classification. The taxonomic treatments include keys in English and French, complete synonymies, diagnoses from similar Canadian species, brief morphological descriptions, and summaries of broad-scale distributional and biological data. Dot maps of confirmed Canadian records are provided (although without accompanying label data, which might have made a valuable appendix). The book ends with a complete bibliography, a checklist of species in a table indicating known occurrence by province, a glossary of morphological and taxonomic terms (with French equivalents), and a complete taxonomic index. The book builds on the groundwork laid in the same authors’ (Bousquet and Laplante 1999) treatment of the histerid fauna of Quebec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Entomological Society of AmericaSame topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207