Cardiac CT in asymptomatic diabetes mellitus: role of non-invasive atherosclerosis imaging in high-risk asymptomatic individuals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The negative prognostic importance of diabetes mellitus (DM) on cardiovascular outcomes is well known. DM is considered as coronary artery disease (CAD) equivalent, which places an asymptomatic individual with DM in the high-risk group. Direct coronary imaging of CAD in asymptomatic high-risk individuals is controversial. In particular, the role of non-invasive cardiac computed tomography (CCT) in asymptomatic diabetics is less well understood.1–6 In this issue of the Journal, Kim et al. 6 shed light on this topic with the results of the CRONOS-ADM prospective registry (CoROnary CT aNgiography evaluation for clinical OutcomeS in Asymptomatic patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus). These data provide insight into several aspects of the DM relationship with time and CAD extent using CCT in an asymptomatic population of individuals. The relevant findings of the study are that DM duration is associated with progression in the extent and severity of CAD which independently predicts an increased risk of major adverse …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".