The relation of carcass physiological maturity to meat quality in the Canadian Bison Grading System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
López-Campos, Ó., Aalhus, J. L., Galbraith, J., Larsen, I. L., Juárez, M., Uttaro, B. and Robertson, W. M. 2014. The relation of carcass physiological maturity to meat quality in the Canadian Bison Grading System. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 94: 55–62. A total of 119 bull (n=62) and heifer (n=57) bison carcasses were selected to determine the effectiveness of youthful to intermediate physiological maturity [ossification at the 9th/10th/11th thoracic spinous processes (≤50%; 51–65%; 66–80%)] range to accurately classify bison carcasses with respect to quality. Carcasses were classified into three maturity groups according to ossification at the 9th/10th/11th thoracic spinous processes (≤50%; 51–65%; 66–80%). Carcass, meat quality and sensory evaluation data were then collected. Bull carcasses were significantly (P<0.0001) heavier than heifers (308.0 vs. 228.6 kg), while heifers had higher (P<0.0001) marbling scores than bulls (368 vs. 289). For both genders, ossification group had little or no impact (P>0.05) on any of the meat quality traits. Gender had an impact on the shear force values for both fresh (P<0.0001) and frozen/thawed (P=0.0002) samples, with bulls having higher values than heifers. Panellists detected differences between heifers and bulls in initial tenderness (P<0.0001; 7.11 vs. 6.27), flavour intensity (P=0.005; 5.40 vs. 5.14), amount of connective tissue (P=0.0002; 7.64 vs. 7.18), and overall tenderness (P=0.003; 7.13 vs. 6.50). Only initial juiciness was significantly affected (P=0.02) by the ossification group (5.38, 5.64 and 5.76). A gender×ossification group interaction was also detected for flavour intensity (P=0.004) and off-flavour intensity (P=0.03), but the magnitudes of the differences were in the order of one-half panel unit or less, generally below the detection of most consumers. The range of physiological maturity studied had limited effects on meat quality and support the elimination of an intermediate physiological maturity grade (51–80% ossification) from the Canadian Bison Grading System.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".