MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175254697

Importance de la gestion du changement dans l'évolution du circuit du médicament

2015· article· fr· W2175254697 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aurélie Guérin, Denis Lebel, Jean‐François Bussières

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOrganizational Change and Leadership
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resume Objectif : Le circuit du medicament fait l’objet d’une attention sans precedent compte tenu de l’evolution du cadre normatif tant a l’echelle canadienne que quebecoise. Cette evolution amene de nombreux changements de pratiques et de technologies qui visent notamment une amelioration du circuit du medicament et une reduction des risques. Dans le cadre de nos travaux de recherche, nous nous sommes interesses au concept de gestion du changement et a ses principes theoriques et pratiques sous-jacents. Description de la question : En depit de tous les changements apportes au circuit du medicament, la capacite a reduire les incidents et les accidents lies a la medication en etablissement de sante a atteint un plateau. Discussion : Afin de soutenir la reflexion des pharmaciens qui se consacrent a la gestion du changement, nous avons mene une revue de la documentation scientifique afin de definir le changement, de situer les theories, les modeles et les approches utilises, et de proposer des strategies de reduction des risques inherents au circuit du medicament et qui tiennent compte de ces concepts. Conclusion : Il existe relativement peu de donnees sur la gestion du changement en pharmacie. Le changement est une modification par rapport a une situation anterieure qui rompt les habitudes et bouleverse l’ordre etabli. La gestion du changement est une demarche structuree et dynamique qui permet de soutenir la direction, les gestionnaires, les parties prenantes, les membres de l’organisation et les equipes destinataires. Elle permet a ces dernieres de s’approprier le changement et de traverser cette periode de transition avec le moins de perturbations et le plus de productivite et d’innovations possibles. Elle permet de preparer l’organisation afin qu’elle en retire tous les avantages anticipes. Cette revue de la documentation scientifique presente brievement 16 theories, modeles et approches, et 10 pistes d’action concrete pour la pharmacie hospitaliere. Abstract Introduction: The medication circuit is receiving unprecedented attention, as its normative framework evolves, across both Canada and Quebec. This evolution is bringing numerous changes to practice and technological aspects aimed specifically at improving the medication circuit and reducing risks. As part of our research, we were interested in the concept of change management and its theoretical principles and underlying practices. Description of problem: The ability to reduce medication-related incidents and accidents in health-care facilities has reached a plateau despite all the changes made to the medication circuit framework. Solution to problem: To support reflection by pharmacists involved in change management, we carried out a literature review to define change, to situate the theories, models, and approaches used, and to propose strategies for reducing the risks inherent in the medication circuit in light of these concepts. Conclusion: There is relatively little data on change management in pharmacy. Change is a modification in relation to a previous situation that discontinues habits and disrupts the established order. Change management is a structured and dynamic process in which support is provided to management, managers, stakeholders, members of the organization and target teams so that the latter can adopt the change and go through their own transition period with a minimum of disruptions, maximum productivity, and as many innovations as possible, and in order to prepare the organization so that it derives all the anticipated benefits of the change. This literature review briefly presents 16 theories, models, and approaches and ten avenues of concrete action in hospital pharmacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.587
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOrganizational Change and LeadershipFrench-language works237,207