MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175344488 · doi:10.1139/v01-116

Cadmium complexes of thiones. Part II.<sup>1</sup> A synthetic, solution, and solid-state MAS <sup>111/113</sup>Cd NMR study of cadmium complexes of 1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione, and the structures of [tetrakis(1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione)cadmium] trifluoromethanesulfonate ([Cd(C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>5</sub>NS<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>](CF<sub>3</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>) and [tetrakis(1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione)cadmium][tetrakis(nitrato-<i>O,O</i><i>'</i>)cadmate] ([Cd(C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>5</sub>NS<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>][Cd(O<sub>2</sub>NO)<sub>4</sub>])

2001· article· en· W2175344488 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Umarani Rajalingam, Philip A. W. Dean, Hilary A. Jenkins, Michael C. Jennings, James M. Hook

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryThiazolidineCrystallographyOrthorhombic crystal systemMoleculeHomolepticCadmiumCrystal structureTetragonal crystal systemMonoclinic crystal systemStoichiometryStereochemistryMetalPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Treatment of Cd(O 3 SCF 3 ) 2 with the stoichiometric quantity of 1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione (tztH) allows isolation of [Cd(tztH) 4 ](O 3 SCF 3 ) 2 (1). When tztH:Cd [Formula: see text] 2 the reaction of Cd(NO 3 ) 2 ·4H 2 O with tztH leads to [Cd(tztH) 4 ][Cd(O 2 NO) 4 ] (2). The structures of both 1 and 2 have been determined by single crystal X-ray analysis. Colourless crystals of 1 are orthorhombic, space group Fdd2, with eight molecules per unit cell (Z = 8) of dimensions a = 20.139(3), b = 23.332(5), c = 14.214(3) Å. Those of 2 are tetragonal, space group I [Formula: see text], with four molecules per unit cell (Z = 4) of dimensions a = 13.8853(11), c = 8.077(2) Å. The discrete homoleptic cation [Cd(tztH) 4 ] 2+ is characterized for the first time in 1 and 2. The cations are of point group symmetry C 2 and S 4 in 1 and 2, respectively. In both cases the ligands are S-bound, and the CdS 4 kernel is a squashed tetrahedron. In 2, the eight-coordinate anion [Cd(O 2 NO) 4 ] 2- is characterized for the second time. 113 Cd CP MAS NMR data are reported for solid 1 and 2, and also for solids produced by fusing Cd(NO 3 ) 2 ·4H 2 O with different molar ratios amounts of tztH, and by fusing Cd(O 3 SCF 3 ) 2 with six mol equivalents of tztH. In the Cd(NO 3 ) 2 ·4H 2 O:tztH mixtures, species identified include unreacted cadmium salt 2 ([Cd(tztH) 4 ](NO 3 ) 2 ) and possibly Cd(tztH) 3 (NO 3 ) 2 . [Cd(tztH) 4 ](NO 3 ) 2 becomes the major species only when a significant excess of tztH is used. In the mixtures with tztH:Cd &gt; 4, neither Cd(NO 3 ) 2 ·4H 2 O nor Cd(O 3 SCF 3 ) 2 form complexes containing more than four tztH ligands. Reduced-temperature 111 Cd NMR data are reported for Cd(ClO 4 ) 2 ·6H 2 O:tztH mixtures in MeOH. Species identified are Cd(tztH) w 2+ (solv) (w = 0–3).Key words: 1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione, cadmium complexes, X-ray analysis, 113 Cd CP MAS NMR, solution 111 Cd NMR, tetrakis(1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione)cadmium(2+) cation, tetrakis(nitrato-O,O')cadmate(2–) anion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0180.018
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0260.010
Bibliometrics0.0110.014
Science and technology studies0.0090.016
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0110.005
Research integrity0.0100.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207