MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175344488 · doi:10.1139/v01-116

Cadmium complexes of thiones. Part II.<sup>1</sup> A synthetic, solution, and solid-state MAS <sup>111/113</sup>Cd NMR study of cadmium complexes of 1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione, and the structures of [tetrakis(1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione)cadmium] trifluoromethanesulfonate ([Cd(C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>5</sub>NS<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>](CF<sub>3</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>) and [tetrakis(1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione)cadmium][tetrakis(nitrato-<i>O,O</i><i>'</i>)cadmate] ([Cd(C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>5</sub>NS<sub>2</sub>)<sub>4</sub>][Cd(O<sub>2</sub>NO)<sub>4</sub>])

2001· article· en· W2175344488 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Umarani Rajalingam, Philip A. W. Dean, Hilary A. Jenkins, Michael C. Jennings, James M. Hook

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryThiazolidineCrystallographyOrthorhombic crystal systemMoleculeHomolepticCadmiumCrystal structureTetragonal crystal systemMonoclinic crystal systemStoichiometryStereochemistryMetalPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Treatment of Cd(O3SCF3)2 with the stoichiometric quantity of 1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione (tztH) allows isolation of [Cd(tztH)4](O3SCF3)2 (1). When tztH:Cd [Formula: see text] 2 the reaction of Cd(NO3)2·4H2O with tztH leads to [Cd(tztH)4][Cd(O2NO)4] (2). The structures of both 1 and 2 have been determined by single crystal X-ray analysis. Colourless crystals of 1 are orthorhombic, space group Fdd2, with eight molecules per unit cell (Z = 8) of dimensions a = 20.139(3), b = 23.332(5), c = 14.214(3) Å. Those of 2 are tetragonal, space group I [Formula: see text], with four molecules per unit cell (Z = 4) of dimensions a = 13.8853(11), c = 8.077(2) Å. The discrete homoleptic cation [Cd(tztH)4]2+ is characterized for the first time in 1 and 2. The cations are of point group symmetry C2 and S4 in 1 and 2, respectively. In both cases the ligands are S-bound, and the CdS4 kernel is a squashed tetrahedron. In 2, the eight-coordinate anion [Cd(O2NO)4]2- is characterized for the second time. 113Cd CP MAS NMR data are reported for solid 1 and 2, and also for solids produced by fusing Cd(NO3)2·4H2O with different molar ratios amounts of tztH, and by fusing Cd(O3SCF3)2 with six mol equivalents of tztH. In the Cd(NO3)2·4H2O:tztH mixtures, species identified include unreacted cadmium salt 2 ([Cd(tztH)4](NO3)2) and possibly Cd(tztH)3(NO3)2. [Cd(tztH)4](NO3)2 becomes the major species only when a significant excess of tztH is used. In the mixtures with tztH:Cd > 4, neither Cd(NO3)2·4H2O nor Cd(O3SCF3)2 form complexes containing more than four tztH ligands. Reduced-temperature 111Cd NMR data are reported for Cd(ClO4)2·6H2O:tztH mixtures in MeOH. Species identified are Cd(tztH)w2+(solv) (w = 0–3).Key words: 1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione, cadmium complexes, X-ray analysis, 113Cd CP MAS NMR, solution 111Cd NMR, tetrakis(1,3-thiazolidine-2-thione)cadmium(2+) cation, tetrakis(nitrato-O,O')cadmate(2–) anion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207