MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SURVEY OF BLOOD PARASITES IN ROSS' AND WHITE-FRONTED GEESE IN SOUTHERN TEXAS

2003· article· en· W2175363511 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher L. Kloss, Alan M. Fedynich, Bart M. Ballard

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Southwestern Naturalist · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBird parasitology and diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGooseJuvenileWaterfowlBrantaBiologyWhite (mutation)ZoologyEcologyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blood parasites have been known to cause morbidity and mortality in waterfowl, particularly in Canada geese (Branta canadensis). However, little is known about blood parasites infecting Ross' geese (Chen rossii) and greater white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons). This study examined wintering Ross' and white-fronted geese for blood parasites. Blood smears from 16 Ross' geese (13 juveniles, 3 adults) and 46 white-fronted geese (21 juveniles, 25 adults) collected in Kleberg County, Texas, during winter 1999–2000 were examined for blood parasites. Leucocytozoon simondi was found in 2 juvenile white-fronted geese; density of infection was <1 parasite/2,000 erythrocytes. Additionally, 3 adult and 1 juvenile white-fronted geese had microfilaria. No blood parasites were observed in Ross' geese. We concluded that low prevalence and density of L. simondi gametocytes circulating in host blood precluded or greatly reduced transmission of this parasite on the wintering grounds in southern Texas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Southwestern NaturalistSame topicBird parasitology and diseasesFrench-language works237,207