MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175378484 · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00354

Stabilization of PE/PEO Cocontinuous Blends by Interfacial Nanoclays

2015· article· en· W2175378484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsLambton CollegeUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMaterials Research Science and Engineering Center, Harvard UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCompatibilizationMaterials scienceLow-density polyethyleneComposite materialPolymer blendPolyethyleneMaleic anhydrideCurvaturePolymerPhase (matter)Shear (geology)CopolymerChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organomodified clays are known to be effective in polymer blend compatibilization if located preferentially at the domain interfaces, but little is known regarding the origin of their localization. In this study, we investigate the effect of organomodifier, clay loading, and shear environment on the compatibilization extent in nonreactive polyethylene (LDPE)/poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and reactive maleic anhydride functional polyethylene (PE- g -MA)/PEO polymer blends. We pose important questions: If clay is to compatibilize blends by interfacial localization, how does organomodifier affect its localization? How does an increase in clay loading affect the shape and elasticity of the interface? What is the shear intensity needed to overcome the equilibrium distribution of clays and delaminate it from the interface? We utilize laser scanning confocal microscopy and 3D image analysis to calculate characteristic phase size and gain unique insights into the connection between the clay loading and the interfacial curvature. Our experiments demonstrate that 1 wt % of interfacially localized clay is sufficient to suppress coarsening and greatly reduce phase domains. However, further increase of clay loading only saw a marginal reduction in phase size compared to 1 wt % clay loading. The interfacial curvature calculations showed that with increase in clay loadings beyond 1 wt % the shape of the interface does not change significantly; however, slight broadening of curvature distribution and increasing asymmetry are observed from 3D images. This can be attributed to the multiple layers of clay jammed at the interface at higher clay loadings. When reactive PE- g -MA was substituted for LDPE, graft copolymers were generated via in situ coupling at the interface. These copolymers combined with clay resulted in the smallest phase domains. In addition, we show that clay dispersion and localization were largely independent of shear intensity, which suggests that clay does not delaminate from the interface even in high shear environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it