Stabilization of PE/PEO Cocontinuous Blends by Interfacial Nanoclays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Organomodified clays are known to be effective in polymer blend compatibilization if located preferentially at the domain interfaces, but little is known regarding the origin of their localization. In this study, we investigate the effect of organomodifier, clay loading, and shear environment on the compatibilization extent in nonreactive polyethylene (LDPE)/poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and reactive maleic anhydride functional polyethylene (PE- g -MA)/PEO polymer blends. We pose important questions: If clay is to compatibilize blends by interfacial localization, how does organomodifier affect its localization? How does an increase in clay loading affect the shape and elasticity of the interface? What is the shear intensity needed to overcome the equilibrium distribution of clays and delaminate it from the interface? We utilize laser scanning confocal microscopy and 3D image analysis to calculate characteristic phase size and gain unique insights into the connection between the clay loading and the interfacial curvature. Our experiments demonstrate that 1 wt % of interfacially localized clay is sufficient to suppress coarsening and greatly reduce phase domains. However, further increase of clay loading only saw a marginal reduction in phase size compared to 1 wt % clay loading. The interfacial curvature calculations showed that with increase in clay loadings beyond 1 wt % the shape of the interface does not change significantly; however, slight broadening of curvature distribution and increasing asymmetry are observed from 3D images. This can be attributed to the multiple layers of clay jammed at the interface at higher clay loadings. When reactive PE- g -MA was substituted for LDPE, graft copolymers were generated via in situ coupling at the interface. These copolymers combined with clay resulted in the smallest phase domains. In addition, we show that clay dispersion and localization were largely independent of shear intensity, which suggests that clay does not delaminate from the interface even in high shear environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".