Cross‐linked chitosan beads for phosphate removal from aqueous solution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Chitosan beads were cross‐linked with glutaraldehyde (GA) and epichlorohydrin (EP), respectively, at variable composition. The general features of the adsorptive and textural properties of the bead systems were characterized using p ‐nitrophenolate (PNP) at pH 8.5. As well, a systematic adsorption study of phosphate dianion (phosphate ( ) species was carried out in aqueous solution at pH 8.5 and 295 K. The Sips isotherm model yielded adsorption parameters for the chitosan bead systems: (i) monolayer adsorption capacity ( Q m ) for PNP ranged from 0.30 to 0.52 mmol g −1 and (ii) Q m values for the bead systems with ranged from 22.4–52.1 mg g −1 for these conditions. GA cross‐linked beads reveal greater Q m values for PNP while EP cross‐linked beads showed greater Q m values for , in accordance with the surface chemistry and the materials design described herein. The EP cross‐linked beads show favorable adsorption–desorption properties and represents a promising tunable adsorbent system for the effective removal of phosphate dianion species in aqueous solution. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133 , 42949.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it