Creating "A Great Ireland in America": Reading and Remembrance in Buffalo, New York, 1872-1888
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent writing on diasporas has encouraged a shift away from viewing them as either quantifiable entities or as inevitable outcomes of international migration. Scholars now seek to highlight the ways in which diasporic identities are actively made and remade, and the connections forged both within and between places from such efforts. This paper addresses two dimensions of the process as they related to individuals of Irish birth and ancestry in Buffalo, New York, in the late nineteenth century. The first dimension relates to print culture and the role of the weekly Catholic Union newspaper in structuring and circulating a diaspora nationalism with a strong anticolonial identification, the second to the process of performing public acts of Irish nationalist memory that were simultaneously declarations of American loyalty. In the latter case, Robert Emmet (1778-1803), organizer of the 1803 rebellion in Dublin, became the pivotal figure around which a culture of commemoration took shape from the mid-1880s onwards. Together, these two dimensions of reading and remembrance offer examples of how diaspora-related cultural creativity was fashioned and articulated in one place and how it could be used to project a distinct Irish-American community while mobilizing opinions about Ireland’s political future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".