MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2175744612 · doi:10.1785/0220140204

Impact of Induced Seismicity on the Evaluation of Seismic Hazard: Some Preliminary Considerations

2015· article· en· W2175744612 on OpenAlex
G. M. Atkinson, Hadi Ghofrani, K. Assatourians

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeismological Research Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCitationIconInduced seismicityComputer scienceHaystackInformation retrievalLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebGeologySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| March 18, 2015 Impact of Induced Seismicity on the Evaluation of Seismic Hazard: Some Preliminary Considerations Gail M. Atkinson; Gail M. Atkinson Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7gmatkinson@aol.comhghofra@uwo.cakassatou@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Hadi Ghofrani; Hadi Ghofrani Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7gmatkinson@aol.comhghofra@uwo.cakassatou@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Karen Assatourians Karen Assatourians Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7gmatkinson@aol.comhghofra@uwo.cakassatou@uwo.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Seismological Research Letters (2015) 86 (3): 1009–1021. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140204 Article history first online: 14 Jul 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share MailTo Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Gail M. Atkinson, Hadi Ghofrani, Karen Assatourians; Impact of Induced Seismicity on the Evaluation of Seismic Hazard: Some Preliminary Considerations. Seismological Research Letters 2015;; 86 (3): 1009–1021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140204 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search ABSTRACT A case study of seismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing operations near Fox Creek, Alberta, is used to evaluate the extent to which the potential for induced seismicity at a site alters the pre‐existing hazard from natural seismicity. We find that in low‐to‐moderate seismicity environments, the hazard from an induced‐seismicity source, if one is activated in close proximity to a site, can greatly exceed the hazard from natural background seismicity at most probabilities of engineering interest, over a wide frequency range. The most important parameters in determining the induced‐seismicity hazard are the activation probability and the b‐value of the initiated sequence. Uncertainty in the value of the key input parameters to a hazard analysis implies large uncertainty (more than an order of magnitude) in the likelihood of strong shaking. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.463
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.320
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.083 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it