Chironomid species, stream classification, and water-quality assessment: the case of 2 Iberian Mediterranean mountain regions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We sampled pupal exuviae in 39 Mediterranean stream sites, situated in 2 mountain regions in the Betic ranges (southern Spain) to test the value of chironomid species assemblages for stream classification and water-quality evaluation. Downstream reaches of these streams are organically polluted to different extents, but the headwaters are protected, providing reference sites for comparison with impaired sites in the mid elevations. A priori classification of sites was done using 7 physiographical and geological variables to differentiate stream types independently of human influence. A posteriori classification and ordination analyses of sites were done on an environmental matrix of 28 variables and a biotic matrix of 204 chironomid species. Regional-scale factors played a more important role than reach-scale factors (i.e., water chemistry) in structuring chironomid assemblages. However, within each region, reach-scale factors such as thermal regime and variables related to water-quality impairment also exerted important influences on chironomid assemblage structure. The indicator value of chironomid species, obtained by comparing reference and impaired sites in the same stream type, showed that 6 species clearly had a positive response to water-quality impairment. This response does not appear to be dependent upon stream type or regional setting, either in the studied area or in other fluvial ecosystems of Western Europe. Moreover, these chironomid species seemed to be distributed along a wide gradient of water-quality impairment, suggesting their potential for evaluating a great range of water-quality degradation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".