MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Feeding Behavior of Spruce Budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Larvae Subjected to Multiple Exposures of <I>Bacillus thuringiensis</I> Variety <I>kurstaki</I>

2003· article· en· W2176196967 on OpenAlexafffund
Gaétan Moreau, Éric Bauce

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Entomological Society of America · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre de Géomatique du QuébecUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAbbott Laboratories
KeywordsBacillus thuringiensisSpruce budwormLepidoptera genitaliaTortricidaeBiologyChoristoneura fumiferanaInstarBruton's tyrosine kinaseLarvaBotanyAnimal scienceHorticultureToxicologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feeding behavior of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens), in multiple exposures to Foray 48B formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner subsp. kurstaki (Btk) was studied in the laboratory. A significant proportion of fourth- and fifth-instar larvae that were exposed to a Btk-contaminated food completely abstained from feeding on that food, even if these larvae had not previously been exposed to Btk-contaminated food. The occurrence of this behavior was higher in fourth-instar than in fifth-instar larvae and decreased with increasing fifth-instar weight. It is suggested that only larvae that have a reduced appetite can successfully abstain from feeding on the Btk-contaminated food over a 24-h period and that active ingredients of Btk or fermentation byproducts associated with the crystal/spore suspension are involved in the process. Spruce budworm did not exhibit aversion learning to Btk, which lead us to conclude that the field efficiency of multiple Btk applications should not be reduced by the behavioral response of spruce budworm larvae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Entomological Society of AmericaSame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207