MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2176632552

Regulatory Convergence in the Canada-United States Automobile Sector

2012· article· en· W2176632552 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Porter

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada-United States law journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvergence (economics)Automotive industryBusinessIndustrial organizationInternational tradeEconomic geographyEconomicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringEconomic growth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MR. SMITH: Good afternoon, everyone.Thank you for the opportunity to be here.My research vice president, Sean McAlinden, intended to be here, 6 but unfortunately Sean truly fell off his horse last weekend.The good news is he is okay, so we can joke about it.The bad news is I have spent this week going all over the Midwest and covering for Sean.I have gone through the industry, giving a background of just about every type of discussion you could have on the issues related to the industry.I am hoping to give you some of that background.To give you a little bit of background about our organization, the Center for Automotive Research, as has been suggested, is a spinout from the University of Michigan.7 We spun out from the University of Michigan back in 2000.We are a not-for-profit organization.8 We still do, basically, the same work we did at the University.At the University, we were too much like consultants for the academics.Now, in the not-for-profit world, we are too academic for the consultants, so we have had to find a niche in between the two of them.The Center for Automotive Research focuses on a wide variety of topics in the automotive industry.We really pride ourselves on being a broad-based research group, funded by government (most of the time).Much of our financing is government focused.9 However, we get other foundation and other government work. .Brett Smith joined the Center for Automotive Research in 2000 after twelve years at the University of Michigan's Office for the Study of Automotive Transportation (OSAT).Over the past twenty years, Mr. Smith has divided his research efforts between automotive industry analysis, and advanced powertrain technology and strategy.He is currently leading several research efforts on advanced powertrain technology, including such projects on energy storage policy and plug in electric vehicle infrastructure issues.He is also program director for the Business of Plugging In, a conference held annually in Detroit, Michigan.Mr. Smith has authored numerous reports ranging from materials for education and training to aftermarket strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0180.008
Scholarly communication0.0180.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanada-United States law journal→Same topicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact→French-language works237,207→