MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2176697328 · doi:10.1562/2004-12-01-ra-390

Pyrimidine (6–4) Pyrimidone Photoproduct Mapping After Sublethal UVC Doses: Nucleotide Resolution Using Terminal Transferase‐dependent PCR

2006· article· en· W2176697328 on OpenAlexafffund
Patrick J. Rochette, Nathalie Bastien, Takeshi Todo, Régen Drouin

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotochemistry and Photobiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPyrimidine dimerNucleotidePhotolyasegenomic DNAMolecular biologyDNACyclobutaneBiologyChemistryDNA damageDNA repairGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UVC irradiation of genomic DNA induces two main types of potentially mutagenic base modifications: cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and the less frequent (15-30% of CPD levels) pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4PP). Ligation-mediated PCR (LMPCR), a genomic sequencing technique, allows CPD mapping at nucleotide resolution following irradiation with sublethal doses of UVB or UVC for most cell types. In contrast, a dose of 80 J/m(2) of UVC that is lethal for the majority of cell types is necessary to map 6-4PP by the LMPCR technique. This compromises the use of LMPCR to study the repair of 6-4PP. To date, no other techniques have been developed to study 6-4PP repair at nucleotide resolution. We have therefore adapted a recently developed technique for the mapping of 6-4PP: terminal transferase-dependent PCR (TDPCR). TDPCR is in many ways similar to LMPCR. This technique is more sensitive and allows the mapping of 6-4PP at UVC doses as low as 10 J/m(2) in genomic DNA and in living cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhotochemistry and PhotobiologySame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207