Distribution of the foliar fungal endophyte <i>Phialocephala scopiformis</i> and its toxin in the crown of a mature white spruce tree as revealed by chemical and qPCR analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phialocephala scopiformis Kowalski & Kehr is a foliar fungal endophyte of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) that produces the anti-insect compound rugulosin and other compounds in lower amounts. Seedlings inoculated with this and other toxigenic endophytes have increased tolerance to the spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens, 1865). The presence of rugulosin in the diet and in needles infected by P. scopiformis reduces the growth rate of the insect. One of 300 white spruce trees inoculated as a seedling in 2001 was chosen to investigate the distribution of P. scopiformis and its principal toxin rugulosin throughout the crown. To facilitate the detection of the fungus in small samples, a qPCR assay was developed based on the ITS region of fungal ribosomal DNA targeting a genetic polymorphism unique to P. scopiformis. The assay was specific, with a method limit of detection 100 ng mycelium per gram needle sample with high reproducibility and accuracy. We found that 11 years after inoculation, P. scopiformis DAOM 229536 and its toxin were detectable in needle samples distributed throughout the crown. Of the 109 samples tested, 100% of the rugulosin-positive samples also tested positive for P. scopiformis DAOM 229536 DNA in the qPCR assay. The mean and median needle rugulosin concentrations were >2 times that required to reduce the growth of spruce budworm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".