MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Variation Among Geographically Separated Populations of <I>Dermacentor andersoni</I> (Acari: Ixodidae) in Midgut Susceptibility to <I>Anaplasma marginale</I> (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae)

2005· article· en· W2177102299 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Glen A. Scoles, Massaro W. Ueti, Guy H. Palmer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Entomology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsBiologyIxodidaeAnaplasmataceaeAcariTickDermacentorRickettsialesVeterinary medicineAnaplasmaParasitiformesVirologyZoologyGeneticsBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anaplasma marginale is a tick-borne rickettsial pathogen of cattle that is endemic throughout large areas of the United States. Cattle that survive acute infection become life-long persistently infected carriers. In the intermountain west the Rocky Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni Stiles, is the most common vector of A. marginale. Male D. andersoni acquire A. marginale when feeding on persistently infected cattle and biologically transmit it when they transfer from infected to susceptible hosts. Host-seeking adult D. andersoni were collected from four widely separated natural populations and tested for susceptibility to midgut colonization with A. marginale. Male ticks were fed on calves persistently infected with a strain of A. marginale naturally transmitted by D. andersoni. Gut infection rates ranged from 12.5% of ticks collected from a mountain site near Hamilton, MT, to 62.5% of ticks from a rangeland site near Riley, OR. Sites near Miles City, MT, and Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada, had intermediate levels of susceptibility. The infection rates differed significantly among populations, and the same populations sampled in two consecutive years were not significantly different from one year to the next. Although there was variation among the populations in the size of ticks, size was unrelated to acquisition of gut infection. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) demonstrated that there was no significant difference between populations in the mean number of genome copies in the guts of infected ticks. A. marginale from infected ticks was genotyped to confirm that they were all infected with the laboratory strain, and a sample of 682 field-collected D. andersoni was surveyed for A. marginale by nested PCR; none were found to be naturally infected. Infection of the gut is an essential constituent of vector competence for A. marginale; in this study, we have demonstrated significant variation among populations in this key component of vector competence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical EntomologySame topicVector-borne infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207