MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

DEVELOPMENT AND INTENSITY DEPENDENCE OF<i>ORNITHODIPLOSTOMUM PTYCHOCHEILUS</i>METACERCARIAE IN FATHEAD MINNOWS (<i>PIMEPHALES PROMELAS</i>)

2000· article· en· W2177312060 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory J. Sandland, Cameron P. Goater

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Parasitology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPimephales promelasBiologyParasite hostingInfectivityCyprinidaeZoologyFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>Animal scienceMinnowImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intensity-dependent development of Ornithodiplostomum ptychocheilus metacercariae was studied in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) exposed to 0, 20, or 120 cercariae. Subsamples of hosts were necropsied at 2-wk intervals to monitor parasite recruitment, growth, and time to encystment. The complex development of metacercariae within the cranium of minnows involved growth, encystment, and consolidation phases, each of which were affected by intensity. At the end of the growth phase, metacercariae from low-dose fish were 20% longer than those from high-dose fish and the latter took 2-4 wk longer to encyst. At the end of the postencystment consolidation phase (6-8 wk postinfection), the size of metacercariae decreased by approximately 50%. The rate of consolidation was slower in high-dose fish. Our results show that time, intensity, and temperature affect development of O. ptychocheilus. Because metacercariae development and differentiation are linked to infectivity, events occurring in intermediate hosts can potentially impact the structure and size of trematode suprapopulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ParasitologySame topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207