Correlation between Electrical and Optical Properties of Tantalum Anodic Oxide and Electron Cyclotron Resonance Etching Studies of E-beam Deposited Ta<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> Films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The anodicTa2O5 films were grown in 5ml/98%H2SO4 electrolyte. Discharge currents were collected immediately after growth. The optical properties were studied with a Spectroscopic Ellipsometer, over a wide range of frequencies from the UV to the IR. It was established that films for which the discharge current followed the known "~ -1" power dependence (characteristic of films that can sustain electric fields of MV/cm) have different optical properties as compared to films for which the discharge current is not represented by that function. Etching studies of the e-beam deposited Ta2O5 films, combined with reflectance measurements after each etch step, resulted in a shift in the reflectance spectrum as a function of film thickness, d. This empirical f versus d dependence (where f is the frequency corresponding to the reflectance minimum for each d) was used to calculate the energies of the 4d doublet of Ta+5 in Ta2O5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".