MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MARINE AND AGRICULTURAL HABITAT PREFERENCES OF DUNLIN WINTERING IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

2004· article· en· W2178050998 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Philippa C. F. Shepherd, David B. Lank

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wildlife Management · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMiljø- og FødevareministerietDivision of Ocean SciencesNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSimon Fraser UniversityBird Studies Canada
KeywordsHabitatGeographyEcologyCalidrisDeltaVegetation (pathology)PastureAgricultureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined winter habitat preferences of individual dunlin (Calidris alpina) in the Fraser River delta, British Columbia, Canada, adjacent to agricultural land near an area of dense and increasing human settlement. We used radiotelemetry and compositional analysis to quantify and describe dunlin habitat selection at 2 scales (regional and local) throughout the 24-hr day and daily tidal cycles. We tested for differences between sex and age classes, and among birds captured at different sites. Patterns of habitat preference differed between sexes and among dunlin from different sites in the delta, but we detected no difference between age classes. We ranked habitat types in order of dunlin preference and tested for significant differences among habitat ranks. Dunlin showed a significant preference for tidally influenced marine habitats at both scales and throughout the study area. However, most individuals (>80%) also used terrestrial habitats, usually during high tide and primarily at night. The role of terrestrial habitats in the ecology of Fraser River delta dunlin previously had been underestimated because these habitats are used far more at night than during the day. Regionally, soil-based agricultural crops ranked above other terrestrial habitats, and pasture was the only terrestrial habitat that was ranked highly and preferred at both scales. Pasture vegetation tends to be short, and pasture fields in the Fraser River delta are fertilized heavily and naturally with cattle manure. We recommend that managers promote the maintenance of a mosaic of soil-based agricultural crops—with a particular emphasis on naturally fertilized pastures—for dunlin and other shorebirds wintering in the Fraser delta. Terrestrial habitat fragmentation also should be kept to a minimum, as dunlin preferred large fields, likely in response to predation risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wildlife ManagementSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207