MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2178316921 · doi:10.1649/865.1

New Synonymies and Notes on North American Loxandrus LeConte (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

2006· article· ceb· W2178316921 on OpenAlexaff
Yves Bousquet

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Coleopterists Bulletin · 2006
Typearticle
Languageceb
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZoologyBiologyGenusEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following new synonymies within the genus Loxandrus are proposed: L. parvicollis Casey, 1918 and L. concinnus Casey, 1918 with L. celeris (Dejean, 1828); L. crenulatus Chaudoir, 1868 with L. crenatus LeConte, 1852; L. calathinus LeConte, 1878 and L. cursitans Casey, 1918 with L. agilis (Dejean, 1828); L. suturalis Casey, 1918 with L. cervicalis Casey, 1918; L. comptus Casey, 1918, L. contumax Casey, 1918 and L. breviusculus Casey, 1924 with L. floridanus LeConte, 1878; L. aduncus Allen, 1972 with L. parvulus Chaudoir, 1868; L. minutus Allen, 1972 with L. pusillus LeConte, 1852; L. vitiosus Allen, 1972 with L. vulneratus Casey, 1918; L. fulgens Casey, 1918 with L. brevicollis (LeConte, 1848); L. ludovicianus Casey, 1918 with L. collucens Casey, 1918; L. limatus Casey, 1918 with L. rectus (Say, 1823); L. reflexus LeConte, 1878 and L. lateralis Casey, 1918 with L. saphyrinus (Chaudoir, 1843). Syntypes of Loxandrus accelerans Casey, 1918, L. collucens Casey, 1918, L. piceolus Chaudoir, 1868, L. piciventris (LeConte, 1848), and L. proximus Chaudoir, 1868 could not be associated with any species treated by Allen (1972) and are likely valid species. Species groups for North American Loxandrus are briefly characterized. Species belonging to each group are listed and their distributions noted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Coleopterists BulletinSame topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207