Prefeeding<i>Dermacentor andersoni</i>(Acari: Ixodidae) on Cattle with Prior Tick Exposure May Inhibit Detection of Tick Paralysis by Using Hamster Bioassay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of prefeeding Dermacentor andersoni Stiles on naive and previously challenged cattle before conducting virulence assays by using hamsters was examined. In an initial observational trial, ticks prefed on a previously challenged heifer did not cause paralysis after transfer to hamsters, whereas ticks from the same lot that were prefed on a naive heifer did cause paralysis. Subsequent paired trails were conducted to simultaneously compare paralysis after feeding on naive and previously challenged heifers. In the first trial, prefeeding ticks on a previously challenged heifer did not result in loss of virulence. In a second trial, ticks fed on a previously challenged heifer had greatly diminished virulence after transfer to hamsters. This also occurred in a third trial after the previously challenged animal had two prior exposures to virulent D. andersoni. Weight gains of ticks that did not cause paralysis after transfer to hamsters were higher after feeding on previously challenged cattle, indicating that loss of virulence was not due to failure of ticks to reattach and feed. Ticks gained little weight on paralyzed hamsters due to the reduced time spent feeding on hamsters when paralysis occurred. Results indicate that assaying ticks for virulence requires prefeeding on naive hosts. If these are not available, rabbits, a resistant host, can be used for prefeeding ticks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".