MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2178810033 · doi:10.1648/0273-8570-72.4.573

EFFECTS OF NEST VISITS ON PREDATOR ACTIVITY AND PREDATION RATE IN A GREATER SNOW GOOSE COLONY

2001· article· en· W2178810033 on OpenAlexaff
Joël Bêty, Gilles Gauthier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Field Ornithology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredationNest (protein structural motif)GooseLarusBiologyEcologyPredatorAvian clutch sizeWaterfowlAnatidaeZoologyHabitatFisheryReproductionFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We assessed the effect of nest visits by researchers on the activity of nest predators and predation rate of eggs in a High Arctic Greater Snow Goose (Chen caerulescens atlantica) colony. The study was conducted in years of moderate (1996) and low (1997) overall nest predation rate. We first compared activity rate (number of presences per h) and behavior of nest predators in the colony with and without investigator disturbance. In one year out of two, activity rate and time spent in the colony were higher during nest visits than under undisturbed conditions for Glaucous Gulls (Larus hyperboreus) and Parasitic Jaegers (Stercorarius parasiticus). Moreover, presence of investigators significantly increased (4.8 times) the probability of nest attack by predators in one year. Nevertheless, the immediate revisit technique showed that the percentage of goose eggs robbed by predators in monitored nests was low (<0.7%) during a nest visit. In addition, we found no significant difference in mean clutch size at the end of incubation or nesting success between nests that were visited repeatedly (8 visits) and those less disturbed (<3 visits). Although some predators can be attracted by and take advantage of the presence of investigators, our results indicate that nesting parameters estimated for this snow goose colony are not biased by nest visits. However, the effect of investigator disturbance could be more important in other arctic nesting bird species that are unable to successfully defend their nest against predators or when predation pressure is very high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Field OrnithologySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207