MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2178821498 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511974441.007

Safer cities or cities of walls?

2010· book-chapter· en· W2178821498 on OpenAlexaff
Rita Abrahamsen, Michael C. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransboundary Water Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSAFERGeographyEconomic geographyComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While the role of private security in resource extraction and conflict situations has attracted considerable attention, its place in the provision of everyday security in the developing world has been the subject of much less debate. Yet it is here, in the routines of daily life, that private security is most pervasive and has some of its most extensive impacts and implications. This is particularly the case in the world’s fast expanding cities. For the first time in history, more than half the world’s population live in urban areas, and in Africa and Asia the urban population is forecast to double between 2000 and 2030, by which time towns and cities in the developing world will make up 81 per cent of urban humanity. In the past few years, urban security has become an issue of increasing prominence on the agendas of national governments, development agencies and international organizations, whether in the guise of human security or as part of more contentious claims about the potential connections between ‘feral cities’ and international terrorist networks. In the ever-shifting politics of security, the urban looks set to become one of the next big things. For urban residents in most of Africa, private security in one form or another is a fact of life. The inadequate resources of public police forces, coupled with their all-too-frequent penchant for coercion and corruption – or what René Lemarchand has described as the ‘moral discredit incurred by the state, both as a concept and institution’ – remains an acute political fact, as it does across much of the developing world. It is also a key reason why corporations, organizations, neighbourhoods and individuals are reluctant to place their security wholly in the hands of the public security apparatus, thus making the uniformed guards of PSCs an ever more familiar feature of the urban landscape. But, like the police, PSCs are the potential providers of both security and insecurity. Stories of private security guards turned villains, robbers and even murderers abound in many contemporary cities, coexisting with tales of their heroism and indispensability. Even if the evidence on both counts is oftentimes, but not always, anecdotal, there is little doubt that a disordered and unregulated private security sector can add significantly to the violence and turmoil of urban space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicTransboundary Water Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207