Les caractéristiques de la consommation de psychotropes chez les personnes âgées en France et au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of psychotropic drugs is considered to be a public health problem in all European and North American countries because of its frequency and the risks it poses for older persons in particular. The present article examines the characteristics of this psychotropic drug use based on a review of the French and Québec literature so as to identify common problems in both countries. There seems to be a number of common characteristics in the use of psychotropic drugs in France and Québec, but studies on the social and psychosocial factors that explain this use are more developed in Québec than in France. Questions about the appropriate use of these products persist: are these molecules prescribed to treat genuine mental pathologies or to try to relieve social distress? Nevertheless, to gain a better understanding of this use and for public health activities to be effective, it is necessary to understand the psychosocial processes involved and to analyze how these products, beyond the treatment of disease, influence the capacity of individuals to deal with life events and aging and, in a certain way, allow them to deny conflict or change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".