Antagonizing Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor α Activity Selectively Enhances Th1 Immunity in Male Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Females exhibit more robust Th1 responses than males. Our previous work suggested that this sex disparity is a consequence of higher activity of the androgen-induced gene peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) in male CD4(+) T cells. The objective of this study was to elucidate the cellular and molecular mechanism of how PPARα inhibits Th1 responses in male mice. In this study, we found that PPARα functions within CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes and NKT cells to negatively regulate IFN-γ responses in male mice and identified Ifng as the gene target of PPARα repression. Treatment of male CD4(+) T cells with the PPARα agonist fenofibrate induced the recruitment of PPARα and the nuclear receptor-interacting protein, nuclear receptor corepressor 1, to specific cis-regulatory elements in the Ifng locus. This recruitment associated with reduced histone acetylation at these sites. Knockdown of nuclear receptor corepressor 1 in primary male T cells abolished the effect of fenofibrate in reducing IFN-γ production. In contrast, treatment of male T cells with IS001, a novel antagonist of PPARα, increased Ifng gene expression and histone acetylation across the Ifng locus. Finally, we investigated the effects of IS001 on IFN-γ responses in mice during infection with the Th1-associated pathogen Listeria monocytogenes and observed that IS001 enhanced IFN-γ production by NKT, CD4(+), and CD8(+) T cells and improved the survival of male, but not female, mice. Our findings provide a novel mechanism of why IFN-γ responses are more robust in females and introduce a small-molecule IS001 that can be used to enhance Th1 immunity in males.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".