MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2179748742 · doi:10.5864/d2015-018

Scoping review on the state of the environment reports in Ontario

2015· article· en· W2179748742 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ama Asabea Asare

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Health Review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandateDisseminationGuidelinePublic healthBusinessEnvironmental healthInformation DisseminationPublic relationsEnvironmental planningMedicinePolitical scienceComputer scienceGeographyNursingWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under the purview of the Ontario Public Health Standards, specifically the Environmental Health Program Standards, Boards of Health (BOHs) are required to identify and report potential public health risks, health hazards, and conditions that can affect healthy environments. BOHs often utilize State of the Environment (SOE) reports to fulfill this mandate. The purpose of SOE reports is to disseminate vital information regarding the status of environmental factors that can impact human health and their related effects. Currently, BOHs in Ontario do not use a common approach to SOE reporting. A scoping review methodology was adopted to evaluate the range of content and level of information covered within the most recent SOE reports from 14 BOHs. The scoping review provided an opportunity to catalogue common themes and information contained within each of the reports. This information was then used to create a framework that could serve as a guideline for future SOE reporting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Health ReviewSame topicEnvironmental and Social Impact AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207