Hippocampus–Entorhinal Cortex Loop and Seizure Generation in the Young Rodent Limbic System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Application of the convulsant 4-aminopyridine (4AP, 50 microM) to adult mouse combined hippocampus-entorhinal cortex (EC) slices induces interictal and ictal discharges originating from CA3 and EC respectively. In this model of limbic seizures, ictal discharges disappear over time and are reestablished after Schaffer collateral cut, a procedure that blocks interictal propagation from CA3 to EC. Here we tested whether this form of network plasticity is operant in hippocampus-EC slices obtained from young (10-25 day-old) mice. In these experiments 4AP elicited interictal (duration = 100-250 ms; interval = 0.7 +/- 0.2 s, mean +/- SD, n = 20) and ictal (duration = 267 +/- 37 s; interval = 390 +/- 37 s, n = 20) discharges in both CA3 and EC. However, in young mouse slices the ictal events occurred throughout the experiment, whereas Schaffer collateral cut abolished CA3-driven interictal discharges in EC without influencing ictal activity (n = 10). Perforant path lesion prevented the spread of EC-driven ictal events to CA3, where interictal and short ictal discharges (duration = 32 +/- 11 s; interval = 92 +/- 9.7 s, n = 8) continued to occur. Hence, two independent forms of ictal activity were seen in CA3 and in EC after separation of these structures. In intact hippocampus-EC slices, ictal discharges were reduced by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist (n = 10). Under these conditions, Schaffer collateral cut abolished ictal activity in EC, not in CA3 (n = 6). Thus the young mouse hippocampus-EC loop has different properties as compared with adult tissue. These differences, which include the inability of hippocampal outputs to control ictal discharge generation in EC and the ability of the loop to sustain ictal activity, may contribute to the low-seizure threshold seen in young individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".