MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

BACULAR SIZE, GROWTH, AND ALLOMETRY IN THE LARGEST EXTANT OTARIID, THE STELLER SEA LION(<i>EUMETOPIAS JUBATUS</i>)

2000· article· en· W2180144950 on OpenAlexaff
Edward H. Miller, Kenneth W. Pitcher, Thomas R. Loughlin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mammalogy · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllometryBiologySea lionExtant taxonMatingIsometric exerciseRostrumZoologyEcologyAnatomyEvolutionary biologyPhysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacula are relatively small in terrestrially mating species of pinnipeds (otariids and elephant seals, Mirounga), perhaps reflecting adaptive size reduction to minimize bacular fracture. Fur seals and sea lions (Otariidae) are a good group with which to investigate this question, because most species copulate solely on land and body size varies interspecifically. We studied bacular size and relative growth in the largest extant otariid, the Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus). Bacula roughly tripled in length and increased 30-fold in mass between 1 and 8 years of age. Allometric relationships changed over development; bacular length and mass changed from being initially positively allometric to body length to negatively allometric and isometric, respectively; bacular mass and thickness were positively allometric to body length throughout life, and apical growth was isometric then was positively allometric to bacular length. In adults (>7 years of age), bacula averaged 18.1 cm length (6.2% of body length), 36.7 g mass, and 2.02 g/cm density (mass : length). The baculum of Eumetopias is about the same length relative to body length as in other adult male otariids but is about twice the density, presumably to increase strength. Information on small or aquatically mating species of otariid are needed to extend our findings and interpretations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of MammalogySame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207