Trap Captures of Male <I>Grapholita libertina</I> (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Moths: Relationship to Larval Numbers and Damage in Wild Lingonberry<SUP>1</SUP>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The lingonberry fruitworm, Grapholita libertina Heinrich, is a tortricid moth whose larvae infest wild lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. variety minus Lodd) fields in Newfoundland, Canada. This study investigated the potential for predicting G. libertina larval damage by using adult pheromone trap captures. Spatial patterns of capture were studied in relation to subsequent larval and damaged berry distributions in four wild lingonberry fields during 1998, 1999 and 2000. A model was tested that incorporated the effects of resource availability and coincident plant composition on insect distribution. In 1998 and 2000, the mean adult capture/trap correlated well with larval (R2 = 0.38–0.63) and damaged berry (R2 = 0.41–0.59) density within grids at each site. In 1999, larval and damaged berry densities were not significantly correlated to adult distributions, and were more dependant on a limited host berry distribution (R2 = 0.54 and 0.47, respectively). The results of this study suggest that correlation between adult trapping of G. libertina and subsequent larval distributions is dependant on a minimal host berry population. Other factors that may contribute variability are also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".