Solvent polarity studies of highly fluorescent laser dye ADS740WS and its fluorescence quenching with silver nanoparticles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Determination of ground state and excited state dipole moments of a highly fluorescent laser dye molecule ADS740WS and comparison of excited state dipole moment by Lippert, Bakhashiev, Kawski–Chamma–Viallet, McRae, Suppan, and solvent polarity methods. Kamlet–Abboud–Taft and Katritzky multilinear analysis for characterizing the solvent contribution into spectral features of the dye has also been studied. Correlation analysis of spectroscopic data with multiple polarity parameters was carried out by multiple linear regression analysis. Optical absorption and fluorescence of ADS740WS in alcohol and other solvents with attachment of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) shows quenching of absorption and fluorescence intensities. This is due to size, shape, and coupling between the AgNPs and the dye, and energy transfer between the dye and the AgNPs. Fluorescence quenching of ADS740WS leads to many applications notably for advancement in biomolecular labeling and fluorescence patterning and chemotherapy in cancer treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".