MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2180309019 · doi:10.1139/v11-047

A novel method to chemically bind thiazolidine-2,4-dione through cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles using malanodialdehyde as a cross-linker

2011· article· en· W2180309019 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Prashant Singh, Kamlesh Kumari, Vartika Tomar, Mohd Samim, Rajan Patel, Gopal K. Mehrotra, Monica Dubey, Narendra Deo Pandey, Anju Katyal

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryChitosanNanoparticleThiazolidineBiocompatibilityDrug deliveryBiopolymerPolymerOrganic chemistryChemical engineeringPolymer chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chitosan is a biodegradable natural polymer with great potential for pharmaceutical applications because of its biocompatibility, high charge density, nontoxicity and mucoadhesion. It has been shown that it not only improves the dissolution of poorly soluble drugs but also exerts a significant effect on fat metabolism in the body. Gel formation can be obtained by interactions of chitosans with low molecular counterions such as polyphosphates, sulfates, and cross-linkers. This gelling property of chitosan allows a wide range of applications such as the coating of pharmaceuticals and food products, gel entrapment of biochemicals, plant embryos, whole cells, microorganisms, and algae. This manuscript is an insight into the exploitation of its properties for microencapsulating drugs. Herein, we report a novel method to chemically bind thiazolidine-2,4-dione through cross-linked chitosan nanoparticles using malanodialdehyde as a new cross-linker and well characterized by FT-IR, NMR, TGA, DSC, powder X-ray diffraction, TEM, and cyclic voltametry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.177
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsFrench-language works237,207