Emergency Percutaneous, Bicaval Double-Lumen, ECMO Cannulation in Neonates and Infants: Insights from Three Consecutive Cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is probably the preferable configuration to assist children with respiratory failure who do not respond to maximized conventional therapies. The single-vessel, double-lumen approach through the internal jugular vein is extremely advantageous, especially in infants, where femoral access presents limitations related to the small dimensions of the veins. In case of emergencies, ECMO might need to be started at the bedside, without the availability of fluoroscopic guidance. To our knowledge, a completely percutaneous approach has not been reported before in children younger than 1 year and weighing less than 5 kg. METHODS: We describe 3 cases of emergency bedside, percutaneous, bicaval double-lumen cannulation under real-time transthoracic ultrasound control in 2 neonates and 1 infant. RESULTS: In our experience, this approach proved to be safe, effective and time saving, while minimizing bleeding from the cannula insertion site. Cannulation times, from decision making to the beginning of ECMO flow, were 30, 28, 25 minutes respectively, from patient 1 to 3. We do not report any cannula-related injury to vessels and heart structures. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggest that, with the described precautions, percutaneous, echo-guided, bicaval double-lumen cannulation in neonates and infants could be effective and free from major complications. Further evaluation should be warranted in the neonatal population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".