MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2180595655 · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.025

Neurodata Without Borders: Creating a Common Data Format for Neurophysiology

2015· article· en· W2180595655 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffery L. Teeters, Keith B. Godfrey, Rob Young, Chinh Dang, Claudia Friedsam, Barry Wark, Hiroki Asari, Simon Peron, Nuo Li, Adrien Peyrache, Gennady Denisov, Joshua H. Siegle, Shawn R. Olsen, Christopher Martin, Miyoung Chun, Shreejoy J. Tripathy, Timothy J. Blanche, Kenneth D. Harris, György Buzsáki, Christof Koch, Markus Meister, Karel Svoboda, Friedrich T. Sommer

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuron · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersWellcome TrustEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilHoward Hughes Medical Institute
KeywordsMetadataNeuroinformaticsComputer scienceStandardizationData sharingData scienceOpen scienceSoftwareWorld Wide WebRaw data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.011
Open science0.0060.014
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReproducibility
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations212
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNeuronSame topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207