MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2180706259 · doi:10.1086/340425

A New Species of <i>Pinus</i> Subgenus <i>Pinus</i> Subsection <i>Contortae</i> from Pliocene Sediments of Ch'ijee's Bluff, Yukon Territory, Canada

2002· article· en· W2180706259 on OpenAlexaffabout
Athena D. McKown, Ruth A. Stockey, Charles E. Schweger

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Plant Sciences · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBractBiologyPinus contortaApex (geometry)BotanyVascular bundlePithAnatomyPaleontologyPinus <genus>Inflorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three structurally preserved conifer ovulate cones are described from Pliocene sediments at Ch'ijee's Bluff on the Porcupine River, near Old Crow, Yukon Territory, Canada. Cones are ovoid to conical, symmetrical, 3.4–4.4 cm long and 2.8–3.4 cm wide, with helically arranged cone‐scale complexes. Ovuliferous scales are thin at the base, expanded at the apex, 2 cm long and 1 cm wide, with flat, rhomboidal apophyses and minute dorsal umbos. Pith is parenchymatous with scattered sclerenchyma at its outer edge. The parenchymatous inner cortex contains 12–15 small resin canals. Outer cortex is also parenchymatous with a thin outer sclerenchymatous zone. Vascular tissues of the scale and bract originate as a complete cylindrical trace from the axis stele. Resin canals are abaxial to the scale trace as it separates from the bract. The abaxially concave ovuliferous scale trace splits into separate vascular bundles that alternate with resin canals in the most distal sections. Bracts separate from scales medially, lack abaxial lobes, and contain terete traces that are accompanied by two resin canals. The paired seeds are elliptical, 2.7–3.9 mm long and 2.1–2.5 mm wide, with wings up to 16 mm long. Fossils were compared anatomically with extant species of Pinus section Pinus. The fossil cones most closely resemble those of Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. but differ from any previously described fossils of this species or extant subspecies by a combination of cone characters. The symmetrical cone shape, nonreflexed cone base, flattened apophyses, cone serotiny, and seed wing length distinguish these cones from P. contorta. These cones are described in a new species of Pinus subgenus Pinus Subsection Contortae, Pinus matthewsii sp. nov. Like P. contorta, P. matthewsii may have been a colonizer of open habitats. The scarcity of these fossil cones, the presence of numerous cones of Picea Dietr. and a Pinus monticola–like species and abundant Picea, Pinus, and Betula pollen indicate dense forest cover dominated by spruce, soft pines, and birch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Plant SciencesSame topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207