Self-Discharge of Rechargeable Hybrid Aqueous Battery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis studies the self-discharge performance of recently developed rechargeable hybrid aqueous batteries, using LiMn2O4 as a cathode and Zinc as an anode. It is shown through a variety of electrochemical and ex-situ analytical techniques that many parts of the composite cathode play important roles on the self-discharge of the battery. It was determined that the current collector must be passive towards corrosion, and polyethylene was identified as the best option for this application. The effect of amount and type of conductive agent was also investigated, with low surface area carbonaceous material giving best performances. It was also shown that the state of charge has strong effects on the extension of self-discharge. More importantly, this study shows that the self-discharge mechanism in the ReHAB system involves the cathode active material and contains a reversible and an irreversible part. The reversible portion is predominant and is due to lithium re-intercalation into the LiMn2O4 spinel framework, and results from Zn dissolution into the electrolyte, which drives the Li+ ions out of the solution. The irreversible portion of the self-discharge occurs as a result of the decomposition of the LiMn2O4 material in the presence of the acidic electrolyte, and is much less extensive than the reversible process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".