MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2181351141 · doi:10.1002/uog.15313

P01.04: Emergency cerclage: evaluation of its efficacy and identification of prognostic factors

2015· article· en· W2181351141 on OpenAlexaff
O. Marra, François Audibert, L. Hudon

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCervical dilationCervical cerclageGestationGestational ageCervical insufficiencyCervical dilatationPregnancyObstetricsCervixInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To evaluate the efficacy of emergency cerclage and identify clinical variables that may have an impact on pregnancy outcome. Retrospective study (2003–2013) of women with singleton pregnancies who underwent emergency cervical cerclage between 15 and 24 weeks of gestation. An emergency cerclage was defined as a cerclage placement in women with a cervical length of less than 15 mm and/or cervical dilation greater than or equal to 1 cm at time of procedure. Subjects were divided into groups depending on gestational age at delivery for comparison of variables. 88 women were identified and 2 were excluded from statistical analysis due to amniotic membrane rupture at the time of cerclage. The mean gestational age at the time of cerclage was 20.5 weeks. The mean cerclage-delivery interval was 72 days. The mean gestation at delivery was 31 weeks. 76 percent of women delivered after 24 weeks, 65% delivered after 28 weeks and 49% delivered after 34 weeks. The mean cervical length at time of cerclage was 7.5 mm and the mean cervical dilation was 1.7 cm. A cervical length < 5 mm prior to the cerclage predicted a delivery before 34 weeks (p = 0.001) whereas a cervical length < 10 or even 15 mm did not predict delivery before 34 weeks. An ultrasound indicated cerclage defined as women with no cervical dilation at time of cerclage predicted delivery after 34 weeks (p = 0.001). The prolapse of amniotic membranes in the vagina predicted a delivery before 28 weeks gestation whereas prolapse at the cervical os predicted a delivery before 34 weeks (p = 0.001). The presence of sludge did not predict preterm delivery. It is known that emergency cerclage can prolong pregnancy and delay delivery in women presenting cervical incompetence. In the last ten years, we have identified 88 emergency cerclage in our centre and the average time gained after an emergency cerclage was 10 weeks. Some variables were associated with a shorter cerclage-delivery interval such as amniotic membranes prolapse, cervical dilatation > 2 cm and cervical length < 5 mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207