MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2181394327 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2009-0052

MIMO SLIDING-MODE AND H∞ CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR DYNAMIC COUPLING REDUCTION IN UNDERWATER-MANIPULATOR SYSTEMS

2009· article· en· W2181394327 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Serdar Soylu, Bradley J. Buckham, Ron P. Podhorodeski

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Reduction (mathematics)UnderwaterCoupling (piping)MIMOController (irrigation)Sliding mode controlControl engineeringEngineeringMode (computer interface)Manipulator (device)Mobile manipulatorControl systemComputer scienceControl (management)RobotMobile robotRobotic armNonlinear systemElectronic engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In underwater remote vehicle-manipulator system (URVM) applications, it is beneficial to have the underwater remote vehicle (URV) hold station using its thrusters while a human pilot operates the serial manipulator. This provides a stable platform for the manipulator and eases the pilot’s job drastically when current and/or tether disturbances are present. The contribution of this work is twofold: Firstly, the reduction of dynamic coupling in the URVM systems is realized using two robust control techniques namely Sliding-mode control and H ∞ control, and the performance of both controllers in the dynamic coupling reduction problem is reported. Secondly, a new control scheme is proposed that involves both controllers in the control loop. Numerical case studies are developed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the controllers. It is concluded that sliding-mode and H ∞ controller combined approach provides superior dynamic coupling reduction performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207