MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2181469683 · doi:10.21000/jasmr06022133

MEND IN THE 21ST CENTURY

2006· article· en· W2181469683 on OpenAlexaff
Gilles Tremblay, Charlene M. Hogan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal American Society of Mining and Reclamation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMine drainage and remediation techniques
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStewardship (theology)DrainageAllianceEnvironmental planningBusinessEmerging technologiesSustainabilityToolboxEngineeringEnvironmental resource managementPolitical sciencePoliticsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sustainable development has become a driving force in how the mining industry approaches all existing and future activities. Progress has been made to advance environmental performance and stewardship and provide benefits to civil society. Technologies are now in place to plan for, open, operate and decommission a mine property in an environmentally acceptable manner, both in the short and long term. Moreover, mining companies, governments and consultants have acquired a great deal more capability to deal with environmental and societal issues such as water contamination from mine wastes, including acid generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal American Society of Mining and ReclamationSame topicMine drainage and remediation techniquesFrench-language works237,207